classic waka stream

思ひけむ人をぞともに思はまし
まさしや報いなかりけりやは
Roma-ji

Omoikemu hito o zo tomo ni omowamashi masashi ya mukui nakarikeri ya wa

English Translation
The one who, it seems,
had given me their love—
I should have loved them too;
truly now, can it be said
that there's no retribution?
Meaning
I should have loved in return the one who, it seems, loved me. Truly, can anyone say there is no retribution?
Commentary
Book Nineteen Miscellaneous Forms 1042

Headnote: "Topic unknown"
Taking up the logic of karmic retribution in the preceding poem, the poet regrets not having returned the love of one who cared for them: retribution is real after all. The two poems stand side by side like question and answer. The author is recorded as anonymous, though one manuscript attributes it to Kiyohara no Fukayabu.
The author is unknown and is recorded as "Anonymous."

First line, "Omoikemu," uses past conjectural "kemu": who must have loved me.
Second line, "hito o zo tomo ni," uses emphatic "zo": that very person, together.
Third line, "omowamashi," uses counterfactual "mashi": I should have loved them. It is attributive in response to "zo," and the poem breaks here.
Fourth line, "masashi ya mukui," uses "masashi," truly, and takes up "mukui," retribution, from the preceding poem.
Fifth line, "nakarikeri ya wa," is rhetorical: was there no retribution? Indeed there was.
Author
Unknown Poet
Source
Kokin Wakashu
Prev Poem
Ware o omou hito o omowanu mukui ni ya waga omou hito no ware o omowanu
Next Poem
Idete yukamu hito o todomemu yoshi naki ni tonari no kata ni hana mo hinu kana